Skip to main content

Lab2

Complied C Lab

In this lab, we were asked to compile a C program, using gcc command with different options.

At the beginning of this lab, we wrote a simple C program that prints a message:

Then using gcc command and the following compiler options to compile the program:
-g               # enable debugging information
-O0              # do not optimize (that's a capital letter and then the digit zero)
-fno-builtin     # do not use builtin function optimizations

Note that the size of file is 73088 bytes

We can use objdump --source a.out command to show source code, the source code is under <main> section. And readelf -p .rodata a.out contains the string to be printed.


Then we add the option "-static" to recompile the program, found out the size is changed to 696264 bytes, which is bigger than the original program. And section headers are also increased.

Next, I removed the builtin function optimization by remove option "-fno-builtin", and rebuilt the program. Note that the size is smaller than using the built-in function to 696256 bytes.

Then I disabled debugging information by removing option "-g"
Note that the size is smaller to 693840 bytes
And there are also more section headers and disassembly outputs.

With adding a number to the argument of printf() function, we note the argument is assigned to a register and added to a stack, and moved.

Finally, I added an option "-O3" instead of "-O0", which is stand to optimization level to 3, I found that the size is not changed, but the lines are less than original.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lab 6A

This lab is separated into two parts, I'll blog my work in different post. In the first part, we've got a source code from professor Chris, which is a similar stuff to our lab5, scaling the volume of sound, but it includes inline assembler. The first thing I'll do is add a timer to the code in order to check the performing time. Build and run the program, here is the output: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- [qichang@aarchie spo600_20181_inline_assembler_lab]$ ./vol_simd Generating sample data. Scaling samples. Summing samples. Result: -462 Time: 0.024963 seconds. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Then I adjusted the number of samples to 5000000 in vol.h: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- [qichang@aarchie spo600_20181_inline_assembler_lab]$ cat vol_simd.c // vol_simd.c :: volume scaling in C using AArch64 SIMD // Chris Tyler 2017.11.29-2018...
Post a Comment
Read more

SPO600 - Project - Stage Three

In this last stage of my SPO600 project, Since I don't have results suitable for upstreaming, I am going to wrap up my project results and do some thorough technical analysis of my results. First of all, I am going to summary what I did for my project. (If you want to go over the details, you can see my previous posts.) I picked a software called SSDUP, it is a traffic-aware SSD burst buffer for HPC systems. I noticed that it uses 3 different Murmurhash3 hash functions, the first two hash functions are optimized for x86 platforms and the third hash function is optimized for x64 platforms. I also noticed that it uses 'gcc -std=gnu99' to compile. In order to easier to handler these 3 hash functions, I split them into 3 files and separately testing them on an AArch64 and x86_64 systems. As the professor said my results in stage two is hard to read, I am going to show my results again in a table format. First hash function (MurmurHash3_x86_32), the execution time for -O3...
Post a Comment
Read more